Website-
Artistic Review- Bryan Farley
dot com
PROMPT: Analyze the
website of teacher Bryan Farley before he changes to new theme?
Requirements:
- 3-4 Paragraphs
- Posted to blog
Must include
- Intro with background information
- Thesis Statement
- Topic sentences
- Examples from site
- Commentary that supports the examples with live links
Objective
|
Standard
|
Below
Expectations
|
Progressing
|
Proficient
|
Exemplary
|
Score
|
Student
will include relevant and sufficient evidence.
|
CCSS W1 | Student includes no background information on piece being reviewed | Student includes minimal background information on piece being reviewed | Student includes basic background information on piece being reviewed | Student provides detailed background on the piece. This background includes historical cultural connections and/or artist information beyond name. | |
Student
will use valid reasoning in order to choose sufficient evidence
in order to support claims
|
CCSS W1 | Student includes no examples from piece. | Student includes minimal examples from piece. These examples may not be relevant. | Student includes specific, relevant examples from piece. | Student includes many specific, relevant examples from the pieces, artfully weaving these examples into the review. | |
Student
will use relevant evidence in order to support claims concerning
interpretation of text and analysis of textual parts as they
create meaning.
|
CCSSW1, CCSS R4, R5 | Student does not address the specific choices within the piece and their effect on the piece as a whole | Student addresses the specific artistic choices seen in the piece and attempts to discuss how these elements provide meaning within the piece as a whole. | Student discusses the specific artistic choices seen in the piece and the meaning of these choices within the context of the whole. | Student uses the specific examples in order to discuss the choices made by the artist. This discussion includes the way in which these choices give meaning, | |
Student
is able to produce clear, coherent writing which uses a style
appropriate to the task, purpose, and audience.
|
CCSS W4 | The writer's opinion is unclear and/or unsupported. The writer does not write for a specific audience. | The writer's opinion is stated, but is not supported. The audience for the review may be unclear or the tone inappropriate | The writer's opinion is clearly stated and supported. The review is written for the desired audience and maintains an appropriate tone throughout. | The writer's opinion is artfully stated and supported. The review flows smoothly from one idea to another. The intended audience and purpose are clear. | |
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
Go to www.bryanfarley.com
No comments:
Post a Comment